Monday, April 26, 2010, Palazzo Vermexio, assembly room of the City of Syracuse.
The sitting of the council of Syracuse, waiting for more than a year on this marina and the sea chests to see who was the Mayor Visentin committed to respond to several questions and doubts of his advisers on the subject, begins with the 's announcement that the mayor will not take part because the Board committed elsewhere and we can not absolutely know where. Some say he was at university, who in the province, even those who say it is in Messina for their commitments related to the chests of the Navy and related investigations, the fact is that it does not respond to phone and no one knows for sure where he is .
doubt that the mayor was not there and that the questions were directed at the wall of the town hall, take the word of the PD advisor Ettore Di Giovanni, who proposed to vote for an amendment to double the appointment of a commission of inquiry to bring to light all events and all the documents that led to this impasse and the establishment of the town of Syracuse in the eventual CIVIL PART process to contractor carrying out the work of cells. At this point the wing of the center with Councillor Messina seeking postponement of the meeting without a deadline or a later date, and vote for the postponement, which was promptly rejected. Then take the word of the counselor Sorbello PDL seeking to double the proposal of the Democratic Party, its support (verbally) to the proposal that the municipality constitutes a civil party but that he opposes and to postpone for 15 days, to appoint a commission of inquiry, asking alderman responsible for them in this , all the cards within two weeks, postponing the vote at the end of them (all the while with words, because in the meantime had no written amendment to the Chairman of Flag). And then you go to vote, rejected the proposal from the Commission of Inquiry (on trust that all the papers will be presented within 2 weeks) because there is already investigating the judiciary and too much clarity could be counterproductive, you go to the second proposal is opposed and one abstained also rejected. At this point Councillor Fabio Rodante of PDL which proposes an amendment in which he inserts this time the proposal that the city is a civil party, besides the fact of removing the boxes in a short time and at the expense of those who do not know, maybe the company offending. Obviously that will reclaim a majority in some ways the same proposal of the opposition is going on a rampage of those who vote NO PD while those of the Centre or UDC ax the classroom so that the end does not even reach the quorum to vote and goes away ... sitting around all'altromondo dissolved and good night dreamers. This is the guide of what was to be a meeting with the Mayor to explain to everyone how he would have solved this story ... 3 hours of talk and hostility between left, right and center to find ourselves always at the same point ... and let me tell you, if with all the problems afflicting our cities and need useful solutions quickly and this is the best we can do really well put!